Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2021-05-07 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2021-05-07 House Journal Page 0919 HB 80 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 80 "An Act establishing the sport fishing hatchery facilities account; establishing the sport fishing facility surcharge; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page FSH RPT CS(FSH) NEW TITLE 5DP 1NR 1AM 301 FN1: (DFG) 301 FIN RPT CS(FSH) NEW TITLE 4DP 6NR 714 FN2: (DFG) 714 Representative Claman moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 80(FSH) "An Act establishing the sport fishing enhancement account; establishing the sport fishing enhancement surcharge; and providing for an effective date." Representative Eastman objected. **The presence of Representative Kreiss-Tomkins was noted. The question being: "Shall CSHB 80(FSH) be adopted in lieu of the original bill?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 80 Second Reading Adopt Fisheries CS YEAS: 32 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 2021-05-07 House Journal Page 0920 Yeas: Carpenter, Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Johnson, Kurka, Prax Excused: Hopkins, Patkotak Absent: Rasmussen, Tarr And so, CSHB 80(FSH) was adopted. Representative Claman moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 80(FSH) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 80(FSH) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 80(FSH) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 80(FSH) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 36 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Kurka Excused: Hopkins, Patkotak And so, CSHB 80(FSH) passed the House. Representative Claman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. 2021-05-07 House Journal Page 0921 There was objection. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 80(FSH) Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 37 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman Excused: Hopkins, Patkotak And so, the effective date clause was adopted. CSHB 80(FSH) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.